Texas Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer

A traumatic brain injury is the injury most often missed at the emergency room and most often disputed afterwards. A normal CT scan does not mean the brain is uninjured, and insurers rely on people not knowing that.

  • 138Google reviews
  • 3Attorneys on your case
  • 2 yrsTexas filing deadline
  • No feeUnless we win

Why a normal scan does not end the question

Standard CT imaging is designed to find bleeding and swelling that require immediate surgery. It is not designed to detect diffuse axonal injury, the microscopic shearing of nerve fibres that causes many lasting cognitive problems. A person can be discharged with a clear scan and still have a brain injury that changes their work and family life.

Specialized imaging and formal neuropsychological testing are what document these injuries. Neuropsychological evaluation measures memory, processing speed, attention and executive function against expected performance, and it produces the objective record an insurer cannot simply dismiss as subjective complaint.

What a brain injury actually costs

The medical bills are rarely the largest number. The larger loss is usually the change in what a person can earn and do. Someone who returns to work but can no longer manage complex tasks, hold attention through a shift, or regulate frustration has suffered a loss of earning capacity even if their job title has not changed.

Where care will be needed for years, a life care planner sets out what that care involves and an economist reduces it to present value. Without that work, future costs are simply argued about rather than proved.

The symptoms families notice before doctors do

Headaches, light and noise sensitivity, sleep disruption, word finding difficulty, irritability and a flattening of personality are commonly reported by family long before they appear in a medical chart. Those observations matter as evidence. Contemporaneous notes about what changed, kept from the first weeks, are often the most persuasive material in the file.

Causes the firm sees

Vehicle and motorcycle collisions, falls from height on construction sites, being struck by falling objects, bicycle and pedestrian collisions, and blast injuries. The mechanism matters because it shapes both the medical picture and the liability case.

Deadlines and why they arrive early here

The two year limit under section 16.003 runs from the injury, not from the day the diagnosis is finally made. Because brain injuries are frequently identified late, the practical window to investigate is shorter than it looks.

Do you have a brain injury claim?

A claim exists where another party's negligence caused the injury, whether that was a driver, a property owner, a contractor or a manufacturer. The harder question in these cases is usually not liability but proof that the brain injury is real and was caused by the incident.

That is why a claim can exist even where the emergency department recorded no brain injury at all. A missed diagnosis is a gap in the record, not evidence that nothing happened.

How the injury is proved when the person looks fine

Objective testing rather than appearance. Neuropsychological evaluation measures memory, processing speed, attention and executive function against expected performance. Specialized imaging identifies structural injury that standard CT does not resolve.

Around that sits the human evidence: treating physicians documenting the course of symptoms, and family, friends and colleagues describing what changed against a baseline they knew. Contemporaneous notes kept from the first weeks are frequently the most persuasive material in the file.

Why these cases take longer, and should

A brain injury claim should not resolve until clinicians can say whether the deficits are permanent. That commonly takes many months, and a settlement reached earlier necessarily assumes a recovery that may not happen.

In the meantime the firm coordinates records across the several providers involved, instructs a life care planner where future care is required, and works with an economist on lost earning capacity. That work is what converts future costs from an assertion into a proved figure.

Who carries the cost of proving it

Brain injury cases are among the most expensive to prosecute, because neuropsychological testing, specialized imaging, life care planning and economic analysis are all expert work. The firm advances those costs under the contingency arrangement, so the standard of proof a client can afford does not depend on their income while they are unable to work.

What this kind of claim can recover

How a traumatic brain injury is documented
MethodWhat it establishes
CT imagingBleeding, skull fracture, swelling requiring urgent care
MRI, including diffusion imagingStructural injury a CT does not resolve
Neuropsychological testingObjective deficits in memory, attention, processing speed
Treating physician recordsCourse of symptoms and response to treatment
Family and coworker accountsChange in function against a known baseline
Life care planCare, equipment and support required in future
Economic analysisPresent value of lost earning capacity and future care

More on brain injuries

Who handles brain injuries at the firm

  • Shanna Valentine, personal injury attorney at The Valentine Law Firm in Cedar Park, Texas

    Shanna Valentine

    Attorney

    St. Thomas University School of Law, Miami, Florida

  • Mike Ely, personal injury attorney at The Valentine Law Firm in Cedar Park, Texas

    Mike Ely

    Attorney

    George Washington University Law School, 2002

All attorneys

Frequently asked questions

Yes. CT imaging is designed to find bleeding and swelling that need urgent treatment, not the microscopic nerve damage that causes many lasting cognitive problems. Specialized imaging and neuropsychological testing are what identify those injuries.

A concussion is a traumatic brain injury. It is usually classified as mild, which describes how it presented at the time rather than how serious the consequences are. Some people recover fully in weeks and some have symptoms that persist for years.

Through objective testing rather than appearance. Neuropsychological evaluation measures function against expected performance, treating physicians document the course of symptoms, and people who knew the person before the injury describe what changed.

Future care is part of the claim, but it has to be proved rather than asserted. A life care planner sets out what will be required and an economist values it in present terms.

Two years from the date of the injury under section 16.003. That clock runs from the injury rather than from the date the diagnosis was finally made, which matters because these injuries are often identified late.

The firm advances those costs. Neuropsychological testing, specialized imaging, life care planning and economic analysis are all expert work, and they are funded by the firm under the contingency arrangement rather than billed to the client as the case proceeds.

Find out where your claim stands

A free consultation covers what your claim requires, what the deadline is, and what insurance coverage is actually available.

Contingency fee. You pay nothing unless we win.

Call Now Free Consultation