Who Is Liable for a Brain Injury in Texas?

Whoever caused the event that injured the brain, and a brain injury can arise from almost any kind of accident. The defendant depends entirely on the mechanism, and identifying every responsible party matters because these injuries are so costly.

  • 138Google reviews
  • 3Attorneys on your case
  • 2 yrsTexas filing deadline
  • No feeUnless we win

The at-fault party depends on the mechanism

A brain injury is an injury type, not an accident type. It arises from car and truck crashes, falls, being struck by an object, sports and recreation, assaults, and medical negligence.

So liability follows the underlying event. A crash points at a driver and possibly an employer; a fall at an occupier; a workplace injury at a third party or a non-subscribing employer; a medical injury at a provider. The mechanism is the first question.

Drivers and their employers

The most common cause. An at-fault driver's liability insurance responds, and where the driver was working, the employer's commercial policy does too, with far higher limits.

In a catastrophic brain injury the driver's own policy is frequently inadequate, so establishing an employer's involvement, or another commercial defendant, is often what makes the loss collectible.

Property occupiers

A fall causing a brain injury, from a height, down stairs, on a hazard, is a premises claim, which requires the occupier to have known or reasonably should have known of the danger. Backward falls onto hard floors, common in older adults, are a recurring cause.

The premises notice element applies as in any fall, and the injured person often cannot describe the hazard, so footage and inspection records carry the case.

Employers and workplace third parties

A brain injury at work, from a fall, a struck-by, or an equipment failure, may involve workers compensation, a third-party claim against another contractor or a manufacturer, or a direct claim against a non-subscribing employer.

Comp does not compensate the cognitive and quality-of-life loss that dominates a serious brain injury, so the third-party claim is frequently where the real value is.

Manufacturers and premises for recreation

Defective helmets, playground and amusement equipment, and vehicles or components that failed can found product claims. Recreational operators, from trampoline parks to pools, can be liable for inadequate safety measures.

These depend on the product or the conditions being preserved and documented, and on the specific standards that applied.

Medical providers

Where the brain injury was caused or worsened by medical negligence, an oxygen-deprivation injury, a missed stroke, a birth injury, the provider is liable, subject to the Chapter 74 requirements covered on the medical malpractice page.

As everywhere, more than one party may share responsibility, and Texas apportions it by percentage. Identifying every responsible, insured party is what turns a large assessed loss into a collectible one.

Summary

Who can be liable, by mechanism
MechanismLikely defendantNote
Vehicle crashDriver, and employer if workingEmployer policy has higher limits
FallProperty occupierPremises notice element applies
Workplace injuryThird party or non-subscriberComp omits cognitive loss
Defective productManufacturerHelmet, equipment, vehicle component
RecreationOperatorInadequate safety measures
Medical negligenceProviderChapter 74 requirements apply

Frequently asked questions

Whoever caused the underlying event, because a brain injury can arise from almost any accident. A crash points at a driver and possibly an employer, a fall at a property occupier, a workplace injury at a third party, and a medical injury at a provider.

Because brain injuries are extremely costly and a single defendant's insurance is frequently inadequate. Texas apportions responsibility by percentage, and finding every responsible, insured party is what makes a large assessed loss collectible.

Where the employer does not carry workers compensation, it can be sued directly. Where it does, comp applies but does not compensate the cognitive and quality-of-life loss, so a third-party claim against another contractor or a manufacturer is often where the value is.

Yes, and it requires the occupier to have known or reasonably should have known of the hazard. Because the injured person often cannot describe what happened, footage and inspection records carry the case.

Talk it through with a lawyer

A free consultation covers whether you have a claim, what the deadline is, and what insurance is actually available.

Contingency fee. You pay nothing unless we win.

Call Now Free Consultation