Texas Dog Bite Lawyer
Texas has no statute making a dog owner automatically responsible for a bite. Liability turns on what the owner knew, or on what they failed to do, which makes the history of the animal central to the claim.
- 138Google reviews
- 3Attorneys on your case
- 2 yrsTexas filing deadline
- No feeUnless we win
The rule Texas actually applies
Texas follows the common law rule set out in Marshall v. Ranne. An owner is liable where the dog had previously shown dangerous tendencies and the owner knew about it. This is often described as a one bite rule, which is misleading. A prior bite is not required. Evidence that the dog lunged, snapped, was kept muzzled, or carried a beware sign can all establish that the owner knew.
The negligence route, which does not require prior knowledge
A separate claim exists in ordinary negligence, where the owner failed to control the animal with reasonable care. Where a local leash ordinance was broken, that failure can amount to negligence per se, meaning the violation itself establishes the breach. This route does not depend on proving what the owner knew about the dog's history.
Dangerous dog rules under Chapter 822
Chapter 822 of the Texas Health and Safety Code creates a process for declaring a dog dangerous after it has caused injury or shown aggression. A declaration imposes registration, secure enclosure and liability insurance requirements. Records of a prior declaration, or of prior complaints to animal control, are strong evidence of the owner's knowledge.
Children and the injuries that follow
Children are bitten on the face and head far more often than adults, simply because of height. Those injuries frequently require plastic surgery in stages over years, and disfigurement and mental anguish are recoverable categories in their own right. Because a child's treatment may continue into adulthood, settling before the surgical plan is understood is a decision that cannot be undone.
Where recovery comes from
Homeowner and renter insurance commonly covers dog bite liability, subject to breed exclusions and to whether the animal was disclosed. Identifying the policy early matters, because the owner's personal assets are rarely the practical source of recovery.
Do you have a dog bite claim?
You have a claim if the owner knew the dog had dangerous tendencies, or if the owner failed to control the animal with reasonable care. Those are two separate routes and only one has to succeed.
You do not need the dog to have bitten anyone before. Evidence of lunging, snapping, muzzling, chaining or a warning sign can establish knowledge, and the negligence route does not depend on the dog's history at all.
What to do, and what to gather
Get medical treatment first, because puncture wounds close over contamination and dog bites carry a high infection risk. Report the bite to animal control, which creates an official record and triggers rabies observation.
Photograph the injuries repeatedly over the following days as bruising develops, identify the owner and the property, keep the damaged clothing, and note any witnesses. Ask neighbors what they know about the dog, because prior incidents are frequently common knowledge on a street and never reported.
How long you have
Two years from the date of the bite under section 16.003. Where the injured person is a child, the position on limitations differs and should be checked rather than assumed, because a child's claim is treated differently from an adult's.
What it costs, and why these claims are cheaper to run
The firm works on a contingency fee and advances case expenses. Dog bite claims are generally less expert-intensive than vehicle or explosion cases, because liability turns on the animal's history and the owner's conduct rather than on reconstruction. Where disfigurement is involved, plastic surgery opinion evidence is the usual expense.
What this kind of claim can recover
| Prior knowledge route | Negligence route | |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Common law, Marshall v. Ranne | Ordinary negligence, or negligence per se |
| What must be shown | The dog had dangerous tendencies and the owner knew | The owner failed to control the animal with reasonable care |
| Prior bite needed | No. Lunging, snapping or warnings can be enough | No |
| Typical evidence | Animal control complaints, neighbor accounts, warning signs, muzzle use | Leash ordinance breach, unsecured gate, dog left loose |
More on dog bites
Texas Dog Bite Law and Owner Liability
Texas has no statute making a dog owner automatically responsible for a bite.
ReadDog Bite Settlement Calculators
Online calculators multiply medical bills by a number, and no Texas court applies a multiplier.
ReadDog Bite Compensation
The categories are the same as any injury claim, but two dominate dog bite cases and are the ones most...
ReadChild Dog Bite Settlements
Children are the most common serious dog bite victims, and their claims are valued and handled...
ReadHomeowners Insurance Dog Bite Exclusion
Most dog bite recoveries come from a homeowners or renters policy, which makes the policy's terms decisive.
ReadNegotiating a Dog Bite Settlement
Negotiation is not the first step, it is the last, and the outcome is mostly decided before it begins...
ReadDog Bite Injury Levels and Value
Dog bites are often classified on a severity scale, and a level 3 or level 4 bite is a serious injury.
ReadCan You Sue for a Dog Bite?
Usually yes, but Texas is not a strict-liability state for most dog bites, so it is not enough that a dog bit you.
ReadWhen to Get Dog Bite Legal Advice
Not every dog bite needs a lawyer, and an honest firm will say so.
ReadDeadline to File a Dog Bite Claim
Two years for most claims. Less where a governmental entity is involved, and longer for a child...
ReadWho Is Liable for a Dog Bite?
Usually the owner, but not only the owner, and not automatically.
Read
Related practice areas
Injury claims overlap. These are the areas most often connected to this one.
Who handles dog bites at the firm
Shanna Valentine
Attorney
St. Thomas University School of Law, Miami, Florida
Frequently asked questions
That description is misleading. An owner is liable where the dog had shown dangerous tendencies and the owner knew, and a prior bite is not required. Lunging, snapping, muzzling or a warning sign can each show knowledge. A separate negligence claim does not depend on the dog's history at all.
A claim may still exist in negligence, where the owner failed to control the animal with reasonable care. If a local leash ordinance was broken, that breach can establish negligence without any need to prove what the owner knew about the dog.
Homeowner or renter insurance commonly covers dog bite liability, subject to exclusions for certain breeds or undisclosed animals. Identifying the policy early usually matters more than the owner's personal financial position.
Yes. A report creates an official record of the incident and of the animal's history, which supports both the claim and any dangerous dog process under Chapter 822. It also triggers rabies observation requirements.
Not before the surgical plan is understood. Facial injuries to children frequently require revision surgery over years, and a settlement closes the claim permanently. Disfigurement and mental anguish are separate recoverable categories.
Nothing to start, and no fee unless the firm recovers. These claims are usually less expert-intensive than vehicle cases, with plastic surgery opinion evidence being the main expense where there is scarring.
Find out where your claim stands
A free consultation covers what your claim requires, what the deadline is, and what insurance coverage is actually available.
Contingency fee. You pay nothing unless we win.