Texas Motorcycle Accident Law
A motorcycle claim in Texas is governed by a handful of statutes that decide whether it can be brought, who pays, and by how much any recovery is reduced. These are the ones that actually change outcomes.
- 138Google reviews
- 3Attorneys on your case
- 2 yrsTexas filing deadline
- No feeUnless we win
Two years to bring a claim
Texas gives two years from the date of the collision to file suit on a personal injury claim under section 16.003 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. A wrongful death claim runs two years from the date of death, which is not always the date of the crash.
The deadline is a hard bar rather than a guideline. A claim filed a day late is normally dismissed regardless of how clear the liability was, and negotiating with an insurer does not pause the clock. A small number of situations extend it, including claims by minors, and they are exceptions rather than the ordinary case.
Fault is apportioned, and 51 percent ends the claim
Texas uses proportionate responsibility under chapter 33. A jury assigns each party a percentage of responsibility, and the rider's recovery is reduced by their share. A rider found 20 percent responsible recovers 80 percent of the assessed damages.
Above 50 percent, recovery is barred entirely. That threshold is why insurers work hard to attribute a share of fault to the rider, and why arguments about speed, lane position and visibility are contested so heavily in motorcycle cases specifically.
The helmet law does not decide fault
Section 661.003 of the Transportation Code requires a helmet, but exempts riders aged 21 and over who have either completed an approved safety course or carry qualifying health insurance coverage.
The more important point is that helmet use is a separate question from who caused the collision. A driver who turns across a rider's path caused that collision whether or not the rider wore a helmet. Helmet use may be raised in relation to head injuries specifically, but it is not a defense to liability for the crash itself.
Lane splitting is not authorized in Texas
Texas has no statute permitting a motorcycle to ride between lanes of traffic. Riders are entitled to the full width of a lane, and a driver who crowds a rider out of one is not excused by the fact that motorcycles are narrow.
Where a rider was moving between lanes, expect that to be argued as a share of responsibility. It does not automatically end a claim, because the other driver's conduct still has to be weighed, but it is a live issue rather than a technicality.
Minimum insurance is low relative to motorcycle injuries
Texas requires liability coverage of 30,000 dollars per injured person, 60,000 dollars per collision and 25,000 dollars for property damage. A serious motorcycle injury can exhaust the per-person minimum during the initial hospital admission.
This is why locating every applicable policy matters more in motorcycle cases than in most others: the at-fault driver's own coverage, any employer policy if the driver was working, and the rider's own uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage where it was purchased.
Claims against a government body follow different rules
Where a road defect, a signal failure or a government vehicle contributed, the Texas Tort Claims Act applies. It imposes formal written notice requirements measured in months rather than years, and many cities set shorter periods by charter.
Immunity is limited rather than absent, and the categories in which a governmental unit can be sued are narrow. These claims are lost on notice deadlines far more often than on the merits, so they need identifying early.
Summary
| Rule | Where it comes from | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Two year limitations period | Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 16.003 | Claim is barred after two years, with narrow exceptions |
| Proportionate responsibility | Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ch. 33 | Recovery reduced by the rider's share; barred above 50 percent |
| Helmet requirement and exemptions | Transportation Code 661.003 | Applies to head injury argument, not to fault for the crash |
| No lane splitting authorization | No permitting statute | Raised as a share of responsibility |
| Minimum liability limits | Transportation Code ch. 601 | Often exhausted by a serious injury |
| Government claims | Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ch. 101 | Short written notice periods; limited immunity waiver |
Keep reading
Cedar Park Motorcycle Accident Lawyer
Motorcycle claims are decided twice: once on the facts, and once against the assumption that the rider must have been speeding.
Practice areaTexas Motorcycle Helmet Law
Texas does not require every rider to wear a helmet.
ReadIs Lane Splitting Legal in Texas?
Texas law does not authorize riding between lanes of traffic. That matters for how fault is divided, but it does not automatically end a claim.
ReadHow a Texas Motorcycle Case Works
Most riders have never been through this and are told very little about what comes next.
ReadMotorcycle Accident Legal Help
Not every claim needs a lawyer, and any firm that tells you otherwise is selling.
ReadMotorcycle Accident Injuries
A rider has no cage, no crumple zone and no restraint.
Read
Frequently asked questions
No. Helmet use does not determine who caused the collision. Texas exempts riders aged 21 and over who completed an approved safety course or carry qualifying health coverage, and even outside the exemption the question goes to head injury damages rather than to liability for the crash.
No Texas statute authorizes riding between lanes of traffic. Where it happened, expect it to be argued as a share of the rider's responsibility. It does not automatically defeat a claim, because the other driver's conduct is still weighed.
Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility. If you are found more than 50 percent responsible, Texas bars recovery entirely. This is why insurers press hard on speed, lane position and visibility in motorcycle cases.
Yes, and it is much shorter. The Texas Tort Claims Act requires formal written notice within months rather than years, and many cities impose shorter periods by charter. These claims are frequently lost on the notice deadline rather than on the facts.
Talk it through with a lawyer
A free consultation covers whether you have a claim, what the deadline is, and what insurance is actually available.
Contingency fee. You pay nothing unless we win.