Who Is Liable for a Construction Accident in Texas?

Rarely one party. A site has a general contractor, subcontractors, an owner, equipment suppliers and manufacturers, and the contracts between them allocate responsibility in ways that are not obvious from the ground.

  • 138Google reviews
  • 3Attorneys on your case
  • 2 yrsTexas filing deadline
  • No feeUnless we win

The general contractor and the control question

A general contractor is generally not automatically responsible for a subcontractor's employees. Liability usually turns on control: whether the general retained the right to control the manner in which the work was performed, or actually exercised it.

Evidence of control lives in the subcontract, in site safety programs, in toolbox meeting records and in who was directing the work that day. It is a documentary question more than a factual one, which is why the contracts matter so much.

Subcontractors other than your employer

Sites run several trades at once. An electrician injured by a scaffold erected badly by another subcontractor has a straightforward negligence claim against that subcontractor.

This is the most common third-party claim on a construction site and the one most often overlooked, because the injured worker's attention is on their own employer and on comp.

The property owner

An owner who retains control over the premises, or who knew of a dangerous condition and did not address it, may be liable. An owner who simply hired a competent contractor and stood back generally is not.

Owner controlled insurance programs complicate this usefully: where the owner procured project-wide cover, there may be substantial insurance available regardless of how responsibility is finally apportioned.

Equipment manufacturers, suppliers and rental companies

Where a machine failed, a claim may lie against the manufacturer for a design or manufacturing defect, or for inadequate warnings. Where a rental company supplied equipment in poor condition or without required guards, that is a negligence claim.

These claims depend on the equipment being preserved. Machinery returned to a rental company and put back into service takes the evidence with it.

Non-subscribing employers

Where the employer does not carry workers compensation, they can be sued directly in negligence, and they lose the common law defenses of contributory negligence, assumption of risk and the fellow servant rule.

That is a significant structural advantage for the injured worker, and it is the reason establishing subscriber status is one of the first things to check.

OSHA violations, and what they do and do not prove

An OSHA citation is not automatically negligence, and OSHA findings are not always admissible in the form people expect. But the underlying standards define what a competent contractor was required to do, in writing.

Fall protection, scaffold construction, trench shoring, ladder safety and lockout tagout are the standards that recur. A documented breach is concrete evidence measured against a written rule rather than a jury's general sense of reasonableness.

Summary

Possible defendants
PartyWhenTurns on
General contractorRetained or exercised controlThe subcontract and site records
Another subcontractorTheir work injured youOrdinary negligence
Property ownerRetained control, or knew of a hazardDegree of involvement
Equipment manufacturerDefect or inadequate warningPreserving the equipment
Rental companySupplied unsafe or unguarded equipmentInspection records
Non-subscribing employerNo comp coverageLoses common law defenses

Frequently asked questions

No. Liability generally turns on control: whether the general retained the right to control how the work was performed, or actually exercised it. The subcontract, site safety program and toolbox meeting records are where that is established.

Yes, where their negligence caused your injury. This is the most common third-party claim on a construction site and the one most often overlooked, because attention tends to stay on your own employer and workers compensation.

Not automatically, and OSHA findings are not always admissible in the form people expect. The standards do define in writing what a competent contractor was required to do, which makes a documented breach concrete evidence.

A claim may lie against the manufacturer for a defect or inadequate warning, or against a rental company that supplied it in poor condition. Both depend on the equipment being preserved rather than returned to service.

Talk it through with a lawyer

A free consultation covers whether you have a claim, what the deadline is, and what insurance is actually available.

Contingency fee. You pay nothing unless we win.

Call Now Free Consultation